I recently plowed through the Bantam edition of The Tell-Tale Heart and Other Writings. I have to say that I absolutely do not get it. I understand that Poe was a pioneer of the American short story. I also get that he is credited with the invention of the detective story. But I don’t think he’s all that great.
As far as the detective stories are concerned – Murders in the Rue Morgue, The Purloined Letter, etc. – I found the smug, self-satisfied tone of narration to be a little hard to swallow. Sure, Monsieur Dupin must be some kind of analytical genius or something, but he also seems to enjoy his superiority to a nauseating extent. And the bit with the monkey was neat, but I would have been a good deal more impressed if he had chosen a less improbably exotic solution to the problem.
I will say one thing in his favor, regarding some nine out of ten of his stories. Poe has a fascinating aptitude for disposing of corpses into various portions of gothic architecture. I’ve gotta hand it to him – he really pushed that point. Dead people in the walls, in the chimneys, in the floor, and even live people, too! What a lark! The obsessive repetition of the premature interment theme really struck me, too – as a bit monotonous.
The collection finished out with his poetry. I can’t critique poetry – I generally dislike it on the whole. This is a personal problem. I figure that we’ve got the whole spectrum of the English language at our fingertips, so I can’t understand why anyone feel the need to force it to stumble and stutter through some preordained iambic obstacle course? I’d much rather have a naturally well-turned phrase, un-crippled and free of the arbitrary restraints of rhyme and rhythm.
I did genuinely like the sea adventure stories. I think that his Narrative of Arthur Gordon Pym was the highlight of the collection. I don’t see why the literary world spends so much time goggling over the rest of his work. The Pym Narrative sits right up with Conrad, Verne and R.L. Stevensen, in my opinion.
So, good adventures, dead and soon-to-be-dead people everywhere, and a snotty amateur detective. I don’t doubt that it all could have worked out to my personal satisfaction if Poe would have shown a little more insight into human character, but he seemed to focus solely on isolated cases of paranoia and madness. It gave me the impression of a very limited, egocentric world-view. And even his discourses on the madness are incomplete – not much development, and no analysis. It just happens, and then ten pages later the story is over. I’m extremely skeptical about Poe’s lasting literary value. A morbid literary curiosity, and no more.